Share:

LOS ANGELES ST over ROUTE 101

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.05500, -118.23833
34°03'18" N, 118°14'18" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LOS ANGELES ST over ROUTE 101
Structure number:53 0629
Location:07-LA-101-0.87-LA
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Total length:128.0 ft. [39.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.4 ft. [5.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,000 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:92.0 tons [83.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:55.2 tons [50.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:71.9
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$1,997,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201571.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16000
September 201371.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16000
May 201171.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16000
May 200971.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16000
May 200771.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16000
November 200474.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16000
December 200292.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16000
February 200271.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16000
May 199871.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16000
August 199472.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood16000
July 199272.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood16000