Share:

HERBERT AVENUE over I 10, BUSWAY, METROLINK

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.05667, -118.18167
34°03'24" N, 118°10'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HERBERT AVENUE over I 10, BUSWAY, METROLINK
Structure number:53 0643
Location:07-LA-010-20.22-LA
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:131.9 ft. [40.2 m]
Total length:347.1 ft. [105.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:72.2 ft. [22.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:12°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,600 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:89.8 tons [81.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:91.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$4,549,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201491.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7600
November 201291.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7600
November 201091.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7600
November 200890.2Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood7600
November 200691.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7600
February 200591.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7600
January 200393.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood3000
April 200191.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood3000
20000.0Not applicable---298200
July 199891.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood3000
February 199594.3Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent22000
July 198994.3Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent22000