Share:

U.S. HIGHWAY 101 over MELROSE AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.08333, -118.29667
34°04'60" N, 118°17'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:U.S. HIGHWAY 101 over MELROSE AVE
Structure number:53 0673L
Location:07-LA-101-4.85-LA
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:113.9 ft. [34.7 m]
Total length:245.1 ft. [74.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:55.4 ft. [16.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:50°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:175,000 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:83.4 tons [75.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:50.3 tons [45.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:65.0
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$2,116,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201465.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood175000
March 201262.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood175000
March 201062.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood175000
February 200862.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood117500
February 200662.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood117500
April 200465.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood117500
March 200265.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood136600
April 200065.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood136600
April 199865.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood136600
November 199665.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory112450
February 199667.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good112450
July 199467.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good112450
May 199266.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good114550