Share:

4TH ST EB & RAMP over STATE ROUTE 110 & RAMPS

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.05500, -118.25500
34°03'18" N, 118°15'18" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:4TH ST EB & RAMP over STATE ROUTE 110 & RAMPS
Structure number:53 0744
Location:07-LA-110-23.01-LA
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Total length:327.1 ft. [99.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.3 ft. [12.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:20.7 ft. [6.3 m]
Skew angle:29°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1951
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,000 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:88.0 tons [80.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:53.1 tons [48.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:69.9
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$2,118,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201469.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good2000
November 201268.9Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood2000
December 201068.9Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood2000
December 200869.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2000
March 200789.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood-
November 200589.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood-
June 200389.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood-
September 200189.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood-
July 199970.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood9000
March 199770.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9000
June 199370.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9000
December 199070.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9000