6TH ST SB OFF-RAMP over ROUTE 110

Map 

Facts 

Name:	6TH ST SB OFF-RAMP over ROUTE 110
Structure number:	53 0747K
Location:	07-LA-110-22.76-LA
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:	94.2 ft. [28.7 m]
Total length:	200.1 ft. [61.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	35.8 ft. [10.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:	32°
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1953
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:	Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	14,500 [as of 2000]
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	76.8 tons [69.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	89.2

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	14,500 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	76.8 tons [69.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	90.0

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	14,500 [as of 1978]
Deck condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	76.2 tons [69.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	88.0

Comments