Share:

4TH ST EB RAMP over STATE ROUTE 110 & RAMPS

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.05500, -118.25500
34°03'18" N, 118°15'18" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:4TH ST EB RAMP over STATE ROUTE 110 & RAMPS
Structure number:53 0787
Location:07-LA-110-23.00-LA
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Total length:309.1 ft. [94.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.8 ft. [10.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:29°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1951
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,000 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:88.8 tons [80.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:72.8
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$1,624,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201472.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good9000
November 201269.8Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood9000
December 201069.8Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood9000
December 200872.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9000
March 200772.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9000
November 200572.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9000
June 200372.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood9000
September 200172.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood9000
July 199972.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood9000
June 199373.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9000
December 199073.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good9000