Share:

FLOWER ST & LRT over INTERSTATE 110

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.02667, -118.27500
34°01'36" N, 118°16'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FLOWER ST & LRT over INTERSTATE 110
Structure number:53 1010
Location:07-LA-110-20.76-LA
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:160.1 ft. [48.8 m]
Total length:285.1 ft. [86.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:77.4 ft. [23.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:53°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1956
Year reconstructed:2012
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,200 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:95.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201495.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10200
October 201295.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory10200
October 201084.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory10200
November 200884.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood10200
February 200784.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood10200
October 200584.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood10200
May 200384.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory10200
July 200184.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory10200
February 199987.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood10200
May 199388.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good10200
November 199093.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good-