Share:

RTE 405 over SEPULVEDA BLVD

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.07167, -118.46667
34°04'18" N, 118°28'00" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 405 over SEPULVEDA BLVD
Structure number:53 1041S
Location:07-LA-405-32.75-LA
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:90.9 ft. [27.7 m]
Total length:94.2 ft. [28.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:42°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,900 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:108.5 tons [98.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:65.8 tons [59.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.9
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$492,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201574.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good8900
August 201374.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8900
August 201174.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8900
August 200974.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8900
January 200874.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8900
July 200674.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8900
February 200474.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8900
January 200274.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8900
January 199874.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood8900
January 199675.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good8900
January 199475.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good8900
April 199275.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good8900
December 198976.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good8100