Share:

INTERSTATE 5 over CONN, BUSWAY, METROLINK

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.05667, -118.21333
34°03'24" N, 118°12'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:INTERSTATE 5 over CONN, BUSWAY, METROLINK
Structure number:53 1333
Location:07-LA-005-18.52-LA
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:120.1 ft. [36.6 m]
Total length:345.2 ft. [105.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:109.9 ft. [33.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:117.5 ft. [35.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:237,000 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:85.5 tons [77.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:51.8 tons [47.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:79.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$6,326,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201479.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good237000
January 201379.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood237000
May 201176.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood237000
December 200878.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood237000
May 200778.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood237000
May 200578.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood237000
June 200378.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood239000
April 200178.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood224800
20000.0Not applicable---292400
July 199878.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood224800
July 199579.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good235200
August 199379.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good210900
May 199179.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good210900