S5&S101-E60 CONNEC over W60-W10, SOTO ST, & RAMP

Map 

Facts 

Name:	S5&S101-E60 CONNEC over W60-W10, SOTO ST, & RAMP
Structure number:	53 1386F
Location:	07-LA-005-16.59-LA
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:	122.1 ft. [37.2 m]
Total length:	675.9 ft. [206.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	53.8 ft. [16.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:	99°
Owner:	State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:	1960
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:	7
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:	Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	37,000 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	8% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	71.8 tons [65.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	90.4

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	37,000 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	71.8 tons [65.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	90.4

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	40,000 [as of 1981]
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:	71.3 tons [64.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	90.9

Comments