Share:

TAMPA AVE over ROUTE 118

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.27333, -118.54667
34°16'24" N, 118°32'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:TAMPA AVE over ROUTE 118
Structure number:53 2647
Location:07-LA-118-R4.64-LA
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:107.9 ft. [32.9 m]
Total length:209.0 ft. [63.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:102.0 ft. [31.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:118.1 ft. [36.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Skew angle:21°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1980
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,500 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.5 tons [54.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:91.3

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201491.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood17500
May 201291.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood17500
October 201091.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood17500
May 200891.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood17500
June 200691.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood17500
December 200491.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood17500
January 200391.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood17500
February 200193.3Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood17500
December 199893.3Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood17500
January 199793.3Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood17500
January 199593.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent17500
April 199193.6Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent17500