Share:

SOTO STREET over VALLEY BLVD & UP RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.06472, -118.19722
34°03'53" N, 118°11'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SOTO STREET over VALLEY BLVD & UP RR
Structure number:53C0011
Location:0.6 MI NORTH OF FWY 10
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:208.0 ft. [63.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.5 ft. [16.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.4 ft. [5.3 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1936
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:27,790 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:57.0 tons [51.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.2 tons [31.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:69.9
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$1,737,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201569.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood27790
June 201368.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood27790
June 201168.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood27790
July 200969.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood25000
April 200769.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood25000
January 200670.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood25000
March 200470.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood25000
May 200171.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22700
June 199971.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22700
September 199771.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood22700
April 199571.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory22700
February 199371.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory22700
February 199171.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good22700