VIA MARISOL over ARROYO SECO
Map
Coordinates:
+34.10278, -118.1908334°06'10" N, 118°11'27" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | VIA MARISOL over ARROYO SECO |
| Structure number: | 53C0053 |
| Location: | 50' E STATE RTE 110 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 78.1 ft. [23.8 m] |
| Total length: | 86.9 ft. [26.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 45° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1940 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 7,500 [as of 2000] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 79.9 tons [72.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 48.1 tons [43.7 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 94.3 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,000 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 80.7 tons [73.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.3 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $816,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,000 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 80.2 tons [72.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.4 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $328,000 |