Share:

4TH ST(UPPER LEVEL over FIGUEROA,FLOWER,RAMP

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.05250, -118.25417
34°03'09" N, 118°15'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:4TH ST(UPPER LEVEL over FIGUEROA,FLOWER,RAMP
Structure number:53C0125
Location:BTWN HOPE ST & HARBOR FY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:104.0 ft. [31.7 m]
Total length:692.9 ft. [211.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.7 ft. [5.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:9
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20,000 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:87.3 tons [79.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:52.4 tons [47.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:70.1
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$5,286,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201470.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good20000
September 201264.8Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood20000
March 201164.8Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood20000
September 200867.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood20000
May 200767.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood20000
April 200570.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood20000
January 200070.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17800
20000.0Not applicable---36000
February 199870.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17800
December 199470.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17800
November 199270.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good17800
November 199070.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good17800