ATLANTIC BLVD over LOS ANGELES RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+33.99500, -118.1800033°59'42" N, 118°10'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | ATLANTIC BLVD over LOS ANGELES RIVER |
| Structure number: | 53C0252 |
| Location: | 5/8 MI N SLAUSON AVE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
| Total length: | 463.9 ft. [141.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 71.5 ft. [21.8 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1931 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 7 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 56,151 [as of 2005] |
| Truck traffic: | 19% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 71.3 tons [64.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 63.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $5,177,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 15,300 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 20% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 58.9 tons [53.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.9 tons [32.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 73.4 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $5,549,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 15,300 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 20% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 58.4 tons [53.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 73.6 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,223,000 |