+34.21972, -118.42333
34°13'11" N, 118°25'24" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:53C1118
Location:0.5 MI E/O WOODMAN AVE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Total length:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Skew angle:13°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1952
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,300 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:71.0 tons [64.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$462,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201477.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood4300
November 201276.5Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory4300
April 201176.5Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood4300
November 200876.5Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood4300
January 200772.4Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood4300
July 200577.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood4500
July 200079.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood1500
July 199879.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood1500
July 199679.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood1500
May 199579.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1500
April 199379.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1500
April 199179.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1500