Share:

CORBIN AVE over LIMEKILM CHANNEL

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.23389, -118.56194
34°14'02" N, 118°33'43" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CORBIN AVE over LIMEKILM CHANNEL
Structure number:53C1145
Location:0.2 MI N NORDOFF ST
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Total length:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:70.2 ft. [21.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Skew angle:13°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:46,000 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:80.9 tons [73.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.8 tons [44.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:72.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$624,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201572.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood46000
March 201372.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory46000
May 201173.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood36000
March 200973.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood36000
September 200673.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood36000
February 200493.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood23200
December 199893.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood23200
December 199693.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood23200
December 199493.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood23200
November 199294.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good23200
November 199094.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good23200