Share:

LAUREL CANYON BLVD over TUJUNGA WASH

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.23528, -118.40389
34°14'07" N, 118°24'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LAUREL CANYON BLVD over TUJUNGA WASH
Structure number:53C1233
Location:0.2 MI N OF 1-5
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Total length:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1952
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:21,521 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:100.9 tons [91.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:60.6 tons [55.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:71.5
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$638,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201471.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood21521
December 201271.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood21521
March 201171.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood21521
December 200866.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood37000
May 200566.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood37000
May 200172.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood19800
April 199872.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood19800
February 199672.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood19800
December 199374.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good19800
January 199074.4Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good19800