Share:

RADFORD AVE over LOS ANGELES RIVER

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.14667, -118.39194
34°08'48" N, 118°23'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RADFORD AVE over LOS ANGELES RIVER
Structure number:53C1293
Location:0.3 MI N/O VENTURA BLVD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Total length:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:35.8 ft. [10.9 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,850 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:65.9 tons [59.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.3
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$383,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201677.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood5850
March 201277.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood5850
April 201077.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood5200
March 200877.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood5200
July 200577.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood5200
October 200077.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5200
September 199877.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5200
October 199677.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood5200
April 199677.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5200
June 199477.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5200
May 199077.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5200