Share:

SECOND PLACE over FLOWER STREET

Map 

Coordinates:
+34.05694, -118.24778
34°03'25" N, 118°14'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SECOND PLACE over FLOWER STREET
Structure number:53C1317
Location:BTWN HOPE ST & FLOWER ST
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Total length:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1968
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2013 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,800 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:60.3 tons [54.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.3 tons [33.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.3
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$700,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201376.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5800
June 201176.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5800
July 200976.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5500
May 200776.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5500
April 200576.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood5500
June 200076.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5500
July 199876.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5500
March 199676.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5500
January 199477.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good5500
January 199077.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good5500