+34.23167, -118.55333
34°13'54" N, 118°33'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:53C1334
Location:0.25 M S/O NORDHOFF ST
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Total length:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:70.5 ft. [21.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Skew angle:13°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1971
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main span design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:40,785 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:99.1 tons [90.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:59.5 tons [54.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:57.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$546,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201557.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairVery Good40785
October 201367.3Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood40785
September 201167.3Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood40785
September 200967.9Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood37500
October 200767.9Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood37500
September 200667.9Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood37500
May 200489.6Not deficientFairGoodGood37500
January 200091.1Not deficientGoodGoodGood34200
January 199891.1Not deficientGoodGoodGood34200
February 199691.1Not deficientGoodGoodGood34200
November 199390.8Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good34200
January 199090.8Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good34200