+33.98361, -118.46583
33°59'01" N, 118°27'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:53C1690
Location:0.2 MI S VENICE BLVD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Total length:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1907
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,582 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:16.1 tons [14.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:50.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$258,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201550.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good1582
August 201350.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood1582
August 201150.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood1582
December 200949.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1270
August 200749.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood1270
November 200650.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1270
November 200453.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood1270
June 200075.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood1270
June 199872.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood1270
May 199672.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood1270
May 199443.6Structurally deficientGoodFairSatisfactory1270
May 199048.1Structurally deficientGoodFairSatisfactory1270