DELL AVENUE over SHERMAN CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+33.98361, -118.4652833°59'01" N, 118°27'55" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | DELL AVENUE over SHERMAN CANAL |
| Structure number: | 53C1691 |
| Location: | 0.25 MI S VENICE BLVD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Total length: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 14.4 ft. [4.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1907 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,270 [as of 2000] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 16.1 tons [14.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 50.3 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $107,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,266 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 17.9 tons [16.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 53.7 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $116,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,266 [as of 1984] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 24.8 tons [22.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 39.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $159,000 |