GLENDALE BLVD over LOS ANGELES RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+34.11389, -118.2633334°06'50" N, 118°15'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | GLENDALE BLVD over LOS ANGELES RIVER |
| Structure number: | 53C1884 |
| Location: | 0.1 MI NE FWY 5 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
| Total length: | 316.0 ft. [96.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.7 ft. [11.2 m] |
| Skew angle: | 18° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1929 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 6 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 10,099 [as of 2003] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 89.8 tons [81.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 64.8 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,814,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,000 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 89.8 tons [81.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 77.5 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,941,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,000 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 89.1 tons [81.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 77.4 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $784,000 |