Share:

WORLD WAY LOOP over SEPULV ONRAMP, CENTURY W

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.95833, -118.40222
33°57'30" N, 118°24'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WORLD WAY LOOP over SEPULV ONRAMP, CENTURY W
Structure number:53C2054
Location:LAX SECOND LEVEL
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:101.4 ft. [30.9 m]
Total length:7457.1 ft. [2272.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:Other Local Agencies [25]
Year built:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:110
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:37,800 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.5 tons [54.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:59.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$83,361,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201459.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood37800
April 201259.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood37800
April 201059.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood37800
April 200859.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood37800
March 200659.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood37800
March 200459.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood58400
June 200256.2Structurally deficientPoorVery GoodGood58400