Share:

96TH STREET over SEPULVEDA BLVD (ROUTE 1)

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.94944, -118.39528
33°56'58" N, 118°23'43" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:96TH STREET over SEPULVEDA BLVD (ROUTE 1)
Structure number:53C2065
Location:AT SEPULVEDA BLVD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:118.4 ft. [36.1 m]
Total length:1061.4 ft. [323.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:14°
Owner:Other Local Agencies [25]
Year built:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:11
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:24,520 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.5 tons [54.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:82.2

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201482.2Structurally deficientPoorFairGood24520
April 201282.2Structurally deficientPoorFairGood24520
April 201064.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood24520
April 200864.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairGood24520
March 200676.0Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood24520
November 200376.0Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood24520
November 200177.1Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodGood32000