Share:

MISSION BAY DR over ROUTE 5

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.81194, -117.22000
32°48'43" N, 117°13'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:MISSION BAY DR over ROUTE 5
Structure number:57 0457
Location:11-SD-005-R23.93-SD
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:191.9 ft. [58.5 m]
Total length:609.0 ft. [185.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:22,600 [as of 2008]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:95.9 tons [87.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:50.3 tons [45.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:72.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$3,232,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201572.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good22600
October 201372.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good22600
November 201172.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood22600
November 200972.8Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood16800
January 200872.8Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood16800
February 200672.8Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood16800
November 200391.5Not deficientGoodGoodGood16800
December 200191.5Not deficientGoodGoodGood16800
March 200073.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16800
December 199776.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood16800
September 199375.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16800
November 199175.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good16800