Share:

INTERSTATE 8 EB over MTDB,BNSF,AMTRAK,I 5,CON

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.76000, -117.20167
32°45'36" N, 117°12'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:INTERSTATE 8 EB over MTDB,BNSF,AMTRAK,I 5,CON
Structure number:57 0568R
Location:11-SD-008-L2.36-SD
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:112.9 ft. [34.4 m]
Total length:1047.0 ft. [319.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1969
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:12
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:55,000 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:67.3 tons [61.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:40.6 tons [36.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:66.9
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$6,731,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201466.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood55000
April 201264.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood70500
May 201064.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood70500
April 200875.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6500
April 200672.2Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood6500
June 200473.2Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood6500
September 200062.1Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood91100
20000.0Not applicable---98600
June 199865.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood91100
October 199476.5Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good4850
September 199273.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good39700
August 199073.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good39700