SEA WORLD DR over BNSF,AMTRAK,MTDB LRT,I 5
Map
Coordinates:
+32.76972, -117.2063932°46'11" N, 117°12'23" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SEA WORLD DR over BNSF,AMTRAK,MTDB LRT,I 5 |
| Structure number: | 57 0607 |
| Location: | 11-SD-005-R20.82-SD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 121.1 ft. [36.9 m] |
| Total length: | 836.0 ft. [254.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 81.0 ft. [24.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 92.9 ft. [28.3 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Skew angle: | 19° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1967 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 39,590 [as of 2000] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 71.0 tons [64.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 42.8 tons [38.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 79.8 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $13,854,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Average daily traffic: | 197,200 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Evaluation: | Not applicable [N] |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 24,500 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 69.3 tons [63.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 42.6 tons [38.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 88.2 |