Share:

SAN DIEGO MISSION over ROUTE 15

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.78611, -117.11444
32°47'10" N, 117°06'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SAN DIEGO MISSION over ROUTE 15
Structure number:57 0624
Location:11-SD-015-R6.67-SD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:144.0 ft. [43.9 m]
Total length:382.9 ft. [116.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.6 ft. [13.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.5 ft. [15.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:13°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11,200 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:88.4 tons [80.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:53.1 tons [48.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:78.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$3,024,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201678.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood11200
January 201479.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood11200
February 201279.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood11200
February 201079.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood11200
March 200879.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood11200
March 200679.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood11200
January 200480.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood8500
January 200280.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7360
June 200080.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7360
March 199880.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7360
January 199680.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good7360
March 199480.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good7360
February 199280.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good7360