MISSION BAY DRIVE over SAN DIEGO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+32.75889, -117.2258332°45'32" N, 117°13'33" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | MISSION BAY DRIVE over SAN DIEGO RIVER |
| Structure number: | 57C0023 |
| Location: | 0.1 MI NW RTE I 8 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 119.1 ft. [36.3 m] |
| Total length: | 1296.0 ft. [395.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 48.6 ft. [14.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 63.7 ft. [19.4 m] |
| Skew angle: | 45° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1950 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 11 |
| Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 55,000 [as of 2005] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 64.1 tons [58.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 68.8 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $12,894,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 55,000 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.0 tons [8.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 22.3 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $13,793,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 55,000 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 33.7 tons [30.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 8.9 tons [8.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 23.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $19,099,000 |