Share:

EL CAMINO REAL over SAN DIEGUITO RIVER

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.97778, -117.23000
32°58'40" N, 117°13'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:EL CAMINO REAL over SAN DIEGUITO RIVER
Structure number:57C0042
Location:0.3 MI S VIA DE LA VALLE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Total length:339.9 ft. [103.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:9
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,500 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:26.1 tons [23.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:18.5 tons [16.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:48.6
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$1,379,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201548.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good13500
November 201465.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good13500
July 201261.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood13500
July 201060.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood16000
August 200860.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood16000
October 200660.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood16000
January 200365.2Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryGood6000
July 200068.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood6000
May 199868.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood6000
May 199467.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6000
May 199267.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood6000