Share:

E MISSION BAY DR over TECOLOTE CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.77083, -117.20778
32°46'15" N, 117°12'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:E MISSION BAY DR over TECOLOTE CREEK
Structure number:57C0183
Location:0.3 MI N OF SEA WORLD DR
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Total length:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Skew angle:16°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,300 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:90.2 tons [82.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:54.6 tons [49.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:79.1
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$425,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201479.1Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodVery Good7300
October 201280.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood7300
August 201079.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15000
September 200879.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15000
November 200779.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15000
November 200579.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15000
December 200279.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15000
November 200079.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15000
March 199879.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood15000
February 199679.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good15000
December 199379.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good15000
December 199179.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good15000