Share:

SEA CLIFF BLVD over WEST MISSION BAY DRIVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.76139, -117.23000
32°45'41" N, 117°13'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SEA CLIFF BLVD over WEST MISSION BAY DRIVE
Structure number:57C0256
Location:0.4 MI N/W RTE I-8
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:106.0 ft. [32.3 m]
Total length:214.9 ft. [65.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:87.9 ft. [26.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:24°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:40,000 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:74.5 tons [67.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.4
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,953,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201580.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood40000
September 201380.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood40000
September 201180.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood40000
February 201080.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood40000
November 200780.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood40000
January 200674.9Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood40000
February 200474.9Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood40000
April 200274.9Structurally deficientSeriousGoodGood40000
July 200084.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood40000
March 199884.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood40000
February 199684.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40000
December 199384.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40000
December 199184.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40000