Share:

MORENA BLVD over TECOLOTE CREEK CHANNEL

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.77278, -117.20306
32°46'22" N, 117°12'11" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:MORENA BLVD over TECOLOTE CREEK CHANNEL
Structure number:57C0422
Location:1.0 MI N OF RTE 8
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Total length:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1957
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11,000 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:77.7 tons [70.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:46.6 tons [42.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$438,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201477.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good11000
August 201077.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood11000
January 200777.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood11000
February 200476.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood11000
April 200276.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood11000
July 200078.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood11000
March 199878.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood11000
February 199679.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good11000
December 199379.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good11000
December 199179.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good11000