Share:

GRAND AVE over ROSE CANYON CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.80194, -117.22194
32°48'07" N, 117°13'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:GRAND AVE over ROSE CANYON CREEK
Structure number:57C0525
Location:0.4 MI W OF MISSION BAY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Total length:155.8 ft. [47.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:98.1 ft. [29.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:39,700 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:69.9 tons [63.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:87.9

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201587.9Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory39700
September 201387.9Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory39700
April 201187.9Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory39700
September 200888.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory38800
November 200788.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodSatisfactory38800
November 200588.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory38800
February 200385.9Structurally deficientSeriousSatisfactoryGood38800
January 200187.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood42000
April 199987.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood42000
April 199688.7Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good42000
January 199488.7Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good42000
January 199288.7Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good42000