Share:

FSR 787 over MIDDLE FORK SAGUACHE CRK

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FSR 787 over MIDDLE FORK SAGUACHE CRK
Structure number:020906000001033
Location:29.7 MI WSW OF SAGUACHE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Owner:U.S. Forest Service [64]
Year built:1977
Year reconstructed:1992
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11 [as of 2002]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Operating rating:39.9 tons [36.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.0 tons [30.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:79.6
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$20,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201479.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory11
August 201268.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair11
July 201068.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair11
July 200868.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair11
July 200485.5Not deficient---10
July 200281.4Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood10
September 199681.4Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood10