Share:

EB STETSON HILLS over SAND CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.91192, -104.70192
38°54'43" N, 104°42'07" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:EB STETSON HILLS over SAND CREEK
Structure number:CSG-N.01-14.00E
Location:.5 MI E CHARLOTTE PKWY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Total length:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:37.7 ft. [11.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,340 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:89.8 tons [81.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:62.9 tons [57.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.1

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201480.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7340
April 201280.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood7665
May 201080.1Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood7665
March 200880.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood4122
April 200680.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood4122
May 200480.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood4122