CHAMPA ST over CHERRY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.74216, -104.9995939°44'32" N, 104°59'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CHAMPA ST over CHERRY CREEK |
| Structure number: | D-01-CC-100 |
| Location: | CHAMPA AT SPEER BLVD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
| Total length: | 109.9 ft. [33.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 65.9 ft. [20.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 25° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1976 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5,890 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 54.8 tons [49.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 32.8 tons [29.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $953,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 20,102 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 73.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,094,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,317 [as of 1986] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 49.5 tons [45.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 29.7 tons [27.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 73.6 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $872,000 |