Share:

23RD ST RAMP over COORS FIELD LOT/RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.75778, -104.99197
39°45'28" N, 104°59'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:23RD ST RAMP over COORS FIELD LOT/RR
Structure number:D-03-V-032A
Location:JUST W OF WAZEE STREET
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:166.0 ft. [50.6 m]
Total length:613.2 ft. [186.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:65.6 ft. [20.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20,622 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:79.2 tons [72.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$3,975,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201576.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood20622
January 201376.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood20622
January 201176.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood24489
January 200976.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood24489
September 200677.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood16657
August 200477.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood16657
November 200278.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood16657