Share:

COORS FIELD ACCESS over BROADWAY

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.76169, -104.98807
39°45'42" N, 104°59'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:COORS FIELD ACCESS over BROADWAY
Structure number:D-04-BOST-052
Location:0.2 MI NORTH OF BLAKE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Total length:127.3 ft. [38.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.4 ft. [11.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.7 ft. [5.4 m]
Skew angle:33°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1999
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:66 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:79.0 tons [71.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.3 tons [43.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:90.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201490.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood66
November 201290.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood66
November 201090.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood33
November 200890.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood33
September 200690.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood33
August 200490.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood33
October 200290.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood33
September 200082.5Not deficientGoodExcellentVery Good250