Share:

SH 88 ML FEDERAL over US 6 ML

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.72541, -105.02509
39°43'31" N, 105°01'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SH 88 ML FEDERAL over US 6 ML
Structure number:F-16-EK
Location:FEDERAL / 6 IN DENVER
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Total length:180.1 ft. [54.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:72.2 ft. [22.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:32,000 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:58.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$701,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201458.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood32000
April 201257.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood37100
July 201057.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood37100
May 200858.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood37100
April 200657.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood44500
June 200458.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood39423
July 200256.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood48921
April 200057.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood40300
April 199857.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood40300
February 199657.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood39700
April 199453.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood38000
June 199251.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood38000
May 199052.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory35000