I 25 ML over US 24 ML, FOUNTAIN CRK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.82820, -104.8350538°49'42" N, 104°50'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | I 25 ML over US 24 ML, FOUNTAIN CRK |
| Structure number: | I-17-DG |
| Location: | IN COLORADO SPRINGS |
| Purpose: | Carries highway overpass over highway and waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
| Length of largest span: | 53.5 ft. [16.3 m] |
| Total length: | 302.2 ft. [92.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 106.0 ft. [32.3 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
| Skew angle: | 15° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1959 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1978 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 6 |
| Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 87,400 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 56.2 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,841,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 85,506 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 41.6 tons [37.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 24.8 tons [22.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 55.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,984,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 53,800 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 32.7 tons [29.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.7 tons [25.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 64.9 |