Kenilworth Ave. rp over WATTS BRANCH

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:Kenilworth Ave. rp over WATTS BRANCH
Structure number:0048
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Total length:57.7 ft. [17.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Skew angle:26°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Year reconstructed:2009
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,200 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:98.8 tons [89.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:72.8 tons [66.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:79.7

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201479.7Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood2200
June 201279.6Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2200
July 201079.6Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2200
August 200650.4Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor2200
August 200467.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair2200
September 200267.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair2200
January 200178.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2200
September 199878.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2200
October 199676.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2200
July 199480.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2200
March 199280.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2200
March 199080.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2200