Share:

TR BRIDGE(RAMPC) over INNER LOOP

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.89236, -77.05256
38°53'33" N, 77°03'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:TR BRIDGE(RAMPC) over INNER LOOP
Structure number:1205
Location:TR BR RAMP C & INNER
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:99.1 ft. [30.2 m]
Total length:247.4 ft. [75.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,500 [as of 1992]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:55.9 tons [50.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:84.5
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$1,500,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201484.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood17500
March 201285.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood17500
January 201085.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood17500
January 200885.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood17500
August 200585.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory17500
March 200385.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory17500
November 200085.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory17500
May 199885.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood17500
June 199688.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood17500
March 199685.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood17500
August 199385.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood17500
February 199185.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood17500