SR 60 over ROCKY POINT CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+27.96722, -82.5619427°58'02" N, 82°33'43" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SR 60 over ROCKY POINT CREEK |
| Structure number: | 100064 |
| Location: | 0.9 MI WEST OF SR 589 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
| Total length: | 61.7 ft. [18.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 92.9 ft. [28.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 121.7 ft. [37.1 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1952 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1982 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 49,000 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 37.6 tons [34.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 22.6 tons [20.5 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 69.6 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 68,000 [as of 1998] |
| Truck traffic: | 20% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 40.8 tons [37.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.9 tons [21.7 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 69.6 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 33,738 [as of 1988] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 40.6 tons [36.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 69.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,002,000 |