SR-618 WB over US41B (22ND ST) & CSX RR


+27.95500, -82.43556
27°57'18" N, 82°26'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:SR-618 WB over US41B (22ND ST) & CSX RR
Structure number:100443
Location:1.0 MI E/O NEBRASKA AVE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Tolls:Yes, on toll road [2]
Length of largest span:155.8 ft. [47.5 m]
Total length:1095.9 ft. [334.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.2 ft. [16.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1981
Year reconstructed:2014
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:25,000 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.3 tons [33.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$14,998,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201594.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood25000
July 201387.7Not deficientPoorGoodGood44300
July 201171.4Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood24250
July 200971.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood23000
August 200771.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood22500
August 200570.8Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood31000
August 200374.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood21500
May 200276.5Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood21500
May 200176.4Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood21750
May 199994.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodGood16000
May 199794.2Not deficientGoodGoodGood16000
April 199587.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16000
March 199388.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16013
March 199188.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good16013