+30.39361, -81.45972
30°23'37" N, 81°27'35" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:SR-105 over SISTERS CREEK
Structure number:720061
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:133.9 ft. [40.8 m]
Total length:755.9 ft. [230.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.7 ft. [11.2 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1952
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Movable - Bascule [16]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,000 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:15% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Pier/abutment protection:In place and functioning [2]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.4 tons [22.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:45.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$30,000,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201545.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor7000
April 201345.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor8100
April 201145.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor6000
April 200956.5Not deficientSatisfactoryFairFair7200
April 200757.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair8600
April 200555.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair8400
April 200352.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair8600
April 200152.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair7200
April 199954.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair7300
April 199752.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair6600
April 199541.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair5300
April 199347.9Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair3475
April 199239.9Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair12770
May 199053.9Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2870