+30.46139, -81.42500
30°27'41" N, 81°25'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:SR-105 over MYRTLE CREEK
Structure number:720071
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1949
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,900 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:46.9 tons [42.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.9 tons [25.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$933,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201574.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3900
December 201374.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3600
December 201174.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3700
December 200974.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3300
December 200773.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3500
December 200573.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3700
December 200373.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory4400
January 200273.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4324
January 200073.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4156
February 199871.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood3658
March 199671.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood2750
March 199465.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2650
April 199264.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2871
April 199070.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood1320