Share:

I-95 NB (SR-9) over KINGS RD.

Map 

Coordinates:
+30.33694, -81.66861
30°20'13" N, 81°40'07" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I-95 NB (SR-9) over KINGS RD.
Structure number:720172
Location:0.2 MI. N. OF UNION ST.
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Total length:126.0 ft. [38.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:68.6 ft. [20.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:71.2 ft. [21.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Year reconstructed:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:65,250 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:87.6

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201487.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood65250
June 201275.2Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood68500
June 201074.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood74000
June 200876.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood59000
June 200675.1Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood69250
June 200474.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood73750
July 200290.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood63000
June 200079.8Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood55500
June 199879.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood59500
June 199674.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairGood73750
June 199489.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good51914
June 199277.7Functionally obsoleteGoodFairVery Good55169
July 199077.8Not deficientGoodFairVery Good53440